Federal Judge ,Criticizes Supreme Court’s Handling of Trump Cases
Federal Judge ,Criticizes Supreme Court’s Handling of Trump Cases In an unusual turn of events, a number of federal judges have criticized the Supreme Court’s handling of cases involving the Trump administration. In rare interviews with NBC News, a dozen judges expressed their frustration over the high court’s practice of overturning lower court rulings with little to no explanation, a trend they say undermines the integrity of the judiciary. The “Shadow Docket” and Its Impact The judges’ primary concern revolves around the increased use of the “shadow docket”—a term coined in 2015 to describe the Supreme Court’s emergency rulings. These rulings are made quickly, often with minimal or no explanation, in contrast to the court’s standard, more transparent process. Historically, such emergency cases were rare, typically limited to last-minute appeals from death row inmates. However, the Trump administration has frequently used this channel to challenge lower court decisions, prompting the Supreme Court to grant these emergency requests in a majority of cases. Ten of the 12 judges interviewed believe this practice leaves them without proper legal guidance and, more critically,


